• Linkedin
  • Youtube
Call 512-457-1177
John McDuff, Attorney at Law
  • Home
    • Disclaimer
  • Tax Law
    • Tax Litigation
      • Sales Taxes
      • IRS Audits
      • Innocent Spouse Relief
      • Tax Appeals
      • Tax Court Suits
      • District Court Tax Suits
      • IRS Penalties & Abatement
      • Failure to File Tax Returns
      • Tax Fraud
    • Tax Collection
      • Offers in Compromise
      • Tax Collection Appeals
      • Payroll Taxes
      • IRS Installment Plans
      • Currently Not Collectible Status
      • Partitions
      • Community Property
      • Transferee Liability
      • Tax Liens & Seizures
      • Wage Garnishment
      • Levies
  • Business Law
    • Business Transactions
  • Blog
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Menu

Sherman Anti Trust Law and Apple

July 13, 2015/in Business Litigation, General Law, Litigation /by mcduff_admin

What is the Sherman Anti Trust Law?

US history books tell that Senator John Sherman, an Ohio Republican, was the main author of the Sherman Anti Trust Act of 1890. Originally, Robber Barons of oil, steel, banking and railroads created “trusts.” These trusts were similar to today’s “cartels” where wealthy principals use hostile buyouts of companies to form “trusts.”

The Sherman Anti Trust Act’s chief aim was to destroy monopolies by outlawing every business contract or combination, or conspiracy in “restraint of trade.” The Sherman Anti Trust Act was supposed to expose the evils of big business and to control big business in the public interest. In 1914, The Federal Trade Commission Act created a five-man Federal Trade Commission whose primary duties were to prevent unfair methods of competition in trade and business that included:

  • Miss branding and adulterating goods
  • False and misleading advertising
  • Spying and bribery to secure trade secrets
  • Closely imitating competitors’ products

Court Decides Apple is in Violation of Sherman Anti Trust Law

The circumstances surrounding court decision that Apple is in violation of Sherman Anti Trust Law are based on the Supreme Court case, the United States of America v. Apple Inc., et al., 12 Civ. 2862 (DLC). The court upheld the violation that Apple and five book publishing companies had conspired to increase the prices on e-books. The lawsuit was filed April 2012. The five co-conspirator publishers with Apple were: Harper Collins Publishers, Penguin Group, Inc. Simon & Schuster, Inc. Hachette Book Group, Inc. and Macmillan Publishers.

According to US Court records, these publishers sold these books from $9.99 to $14.99 as recommended in a meeting with the five publishers and Eddy Cue, Sr. VP of Apple’s Internet Software and Services for which Apple would receive a 30% commission. When Amazon.com discovered this Apple agreement with these publishers, it tried to discourage authors from selling their books directly to online buyers. Amazon later sent another letter to the US Federal Trade Commission regarding the agreements between Apple and the five publishers.

As the case proceeded, the court determined that the Sherman Anti Trust Act had been violated as a result of Apple creating an agreement that created unfair competition due to publishers withholding books from Amazon and fixing the prices to appear equal to that of the prices Amazon was selling their e-books.

The entire premise of the Apple and five publishers’ agreement was based on a mutual adoption of an agency “model.” Amazon hadn’t adopted the agency modeling allowing the publishers to withhold e-books from sale on Amazon. This is where the crux of the violation of the Sherman Anti Trust Act lies. By disallowing Amazon to sell the publishers’ e-books, this created unfair methods of competition in trade and business for related e-book sellers.

The Verdict by the Court

The court uncovered considerable evidence that clearly showed that Apple and five publishers had, as a result of their meeting with Eddy Cue, joined together in “a horizontal price-fixing conspiracy.”

Evidence also showed that “Apple violated Section 1 of the Sherman Act by conspiring with the Publishers to eliminate retail price competition and raise the price of e-books.” The court concluded through evidence that “Apple was a knowing and active member of the conspiracy, proving by the Plaintiff, “a per se violation of the Sherman Act.”

Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter

Tutorials and Articles by Category

  • Business Closing
  • Business Contracts
  • Business Litigation
  • Business Transactions
  • Buying or Selling a Business
  • Construction Litigation
  • Economy
  • General Law
  • Innocent Spouse Doctrine
  • Investment Fraud
  • IRS Audits
  • Litigation
  • Mergers and Acquisitions
  • Negotiation
  • Separate Property
  • Tax Fraud
  • Tax Law
  • Tax Litigation
  • Taxation
  • Uncategorized

Recent Articles

  • Complying with Requirement to Report a Foreign Bank Account
  • Key Tips for Buying a Business
  • The Taxpayers Bill of Rights
  • Apple Gains Unanticipated Tax Advantage
  • Lego Wins Copyright Suit Against Chinese Companies
  • Texas Men Sentenced for $6..4 Million Diamond Investment Fraud
  • Priest Prisoned For Tax Evasion
  • DRK Photo Agency Not Allowed to Sue McGraw-Hill

Key Practice Areas

  • Austin Tax Lawyer [Home]
  • Business Transactions
  • Tax Litigation
  • Tax Collection
AV Peer Rating of 5 out of 5 for Mr. McDuff
John McDuff, Attorney at Law, practices business and tax law in Austin (Travis County) and throughout Central Texas, and as well as in other states.
Austin Tax Lawyer John McDuff


John McDuff, Attorney at Law
501 Congress Ave, Ste 150
Austin, TX 78701
Tel: 512-457-1177
Google Maps: Read our Reviews

© 2015 by John McDuff, Attorney at Law. All rights reserved. Marketing by TastyPlacement.
President Obama’s Overtime Pay Proposal: The Ups and Downs Research & Development Tax Credit Scroll to top